#Humans will pack-bond with goddamn anything up to and including weather formations
Humans: Isn’t it charming and quaint how our ancestors gave spirits and personalities and godhoods to everything around them. Their primitive, unenlightened eyes must have seen things so differently to us, wise in their own way.
Also humans: That cloud group is named Hector and he likes to hang out at the beach for half of the year.
if you’re above the age of 12 and still infighting with other trans people i’m going to smack you upside the head multiple state governments are trying to fucking eradicate us. sock (they/it) is not your fucking enemy ron desantis, bill lee, mike parson, greg abott, and many, many others are.
check this pedophile’s dm’s :)
it’s just your dad in there i’m making him feel like he has a clit
you literally have one joke lol
i scrolled through your blog for five minutes and saw you post a picture of the same poorly cropped trans flag color swastika 8 times.
going to the punk show and everyone is mad at me for wearing pre-pissed jeans “he didn’t even piss them himself” they say “he bought them that way” and they all think I am the biggest poser of the night
Getting a few questions about why the bosses are letting us go wild with frogs on here, because “isn’t that unprofessional/off brand?” and what you really need to understand about this company is that for years now they have been regularly uploading the same photo of a slice of bread to Facebook/Instagram and it has consistently gone viral (and none of us know why) so if anything the frog headline is *less* off brand than normal.
They keep posting the bread because it’s actually a really good way to gauge whether other posts are performing better/worse than some random picture, but really it’s just become a tradition more than anything so there’s no real logic behind it other than being able to say “wow, that headline is worse than sliced bread.”
Anyway, here’s the fan favorite bread in all it’s glory, in case you were wondering:
People with most mainstream tastes imaginable should not open their mouth on how anti piracy they are btw. Yea no shit you can depend on legal sources to watch Marvel and listen to tswift and Maroon 5. Thank you so much for signing the petition to close that platform that was the only one i could download this 2008 romanian dungeon synth ep from
Cheryl Dunye’s directorial debut, The Watermelon Woman, was out of print between 2000 and 2018. Garth Marenghi’s Darkplace was only available to watch on a pirate channel on YouTube until last year. There is still no way to watch the X-Files spinoff, The Lone Gunmen except to own a dvd box set that has been out of print since 2005. Or to pirate it. It’s on YouTube.
Piracy is incredibly important to keep media that’s weird, or out there or just embarrassing to someone in power, alive. We need piracy and we need to stop being snitches when someone pirates stuff.
this anime passed the bechdel test during the hot springs episode when the girls were comparing titty sizes
to be fair the original point of the bechdel test was “can i interpret these two characters as lesbians” and there is quite a lot of bad harem anime where the answer is “yes”
The really hilariously ill-conceived part of the Twitter rate limiting thing is that comments and retweets are the same kind of entity as tweets in the back-end database, they’re just “parented” to whatever tweet they’re commenting on or retweeting, and the rate limit they’ve placed on the API simply counts how many of those entities you’ve requested without checking a. whether they’re the children of another entity or not, nor b. whether you’ve already seen that particular entity today.
Thus, the limit isn’t really “600 tweets”. A tweet, each comment on that tweet, and each retweet of that tweet all count against the limit as you view them. For example, if a quote-retweet crosses your dashboard, the quote-retweet itself and the little preview of what it’s responding to that appears above it each count separately against the limit. Click into that quote-retweet to read the comments? They both get counted against your limit a second time, as does each individual comment you read – and heaven help you if any of those comments were themselves commented upon!
The upshot is that if your account isn’t verified, using Twitter in the manner that its own monetisation model assumes – and, indeed demands – it will be used can easily exhaust your entire daily allocation of tweet views in as little as a couple dozen engagements.
so that’s why i ran out in like two hours
If anything, two hours reflects a very restrained usage pattern. Owing to the way that tweet views are counted, somebody who’s using the site the way its user experience “wants” it to be used might readily burn through their daily 600 views in five to ten minutes!
Wait, wait, wait, so, Twitter now works like those mobile games that give you free “lives” and once you’re out, sorry! Wait til tomorrow… or pay!
It’s a bit worse than that, because the verified limit is only 6000 views, and there’s presently no way to increase it beyond that. That might feel like a big number, but for the reasons outlined above, even a paying user with an ideal usage pattern will be able to use site for perhaps 60 minutes a day before they get put on hold, too.
ALT
